翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Social engagement
・ Social engineering
・ Social engineering (political science)
・ Social engineering (security)
・ Social enterprise
・ Social Enterprise Association
・ Social Enterprise East Midlands
・ Social Enterprise Europe
・ Social Enterprise Investment Fund
・ Social enterprise lending
・ Social Enterprise London
・ Social entrepreneurship
・ Social entropy
・ Social environment
・ Social epidemiology
Social epistemology
・ Social Epistemology (journal)
・ Social equality
・ Social Equality Party (Germany)
・ Social equilibrium
・ Social equity
・ Social estates in the Russian Empire
・ Social Europe Journal
・ Social Evolution
・ Social evolution
・ Social Evolution & History
・ Social exchange theory
・ Social exclusion
・ Social Exclusion Task Force
・ Social experiment


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Social epistemology : ウィキペディア英語版
Social epistemology

Social epistemology refers to a broad set of approaches to the study of knowledge that construes human knowledge as a collective achievement. Another way of characterizing social epistemology is as the study of the social dimensions of knowledge.〔http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/〕 One of the enduring difficulties with defining "social epistemology" is that of determining what the word "knowledge" means in this context. There is also a challenge in arriving at a definition of "social" which satisfies academics from different disciplines.〔http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/〕 Social epistemologists may be found working in many of the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences, most commonly in philosophy and sociology. In addition to marking a distinct movement in traditional, analytic epistemology, social epistemology is associated with the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS).
==The emergence of social epistemology==
The term "social epistemology" was first used by the library scientists Margaret Egan and Jesse Shera in the 1950s. Steven Shapin also used it in 1979. But its current sense began to emerge in the late 1980s. In 1987, the philosophical journal ''Synthese'' published a special issue on "social epistemology" which included two authors that have since taken "social epistemology" in two divergent directions: Alvin Goldman and Steve Fuller3. Fuller founded a journal called ''Social Epistemology: a journal of knowledge, culture, and policy'' in 1987 and published his first book, ''Social Epistemology'', in 1988. Goldman's ''Knowledge in a Social World'' came out in 1999. Goldman advocates for a type of epistemology which is sometimes called "veritistic epistemology" because of its large emphasis on truth.〔http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/goldman.html〕 This type of epistemology is sometimes seen to side with "essentialism" as opposed to "multiculturalism".〔http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/goldman.html〕 But Goldman has argued that this association between veritistic epistemology and essentialism is not necessary.〔http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/goldman.html〕
In 2012, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of ''Social Epistemology'', Fuller reflected on the history and the prospects of the field, including the need for social epistemology to re-connect with the larger issues of knowledge production first identified by Charles Sanders Peirce as ''cognitive economy'' and nowadays often pursued by library and information science. As for the "analytic social epistemology", to which Goldman has been a significant contributor, Fuller concludes that it has "failed to make significant progress owing, in part, to a minimal understanding of actual knowledge practices, a minimised role for philosophers in ongoing inquiry, and a focus on maintaining the status quo of epistemology as a field."()
The basic view of knowledge that motivated the emergence of social epistemology can be traced to the work of Thomas Kuhn and Michel Foucault, which gained in prominence at the end of the 1960s. Both brought historical concerns directly to bear on problems long associated with the philosophy of science. Perhaps the most notable issue here was the nature of truth, which both Kuhn and Foucault described as a relative and contingent notion. On this background, ongoing work in the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) and the history and philosophy of science (HPS) was able to assert its epistemological consequences, leading most notably to the establishment of the "Strong Programme" at the University of Edinburgh. In terms of the two strands of social epistemology, Fuller is more sensitive and receptive to this historical trajectory (if not always in agreement) than Goldman, whose "veritistic" social epistemology can be reasonably read as a systematic rejection of the more extreme claims associated with Kuhn and Foucault.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Social epistemology」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.